top of page

Inspired by Alexander von Humboldt, 1769 - 1859

Voices of the Global Ecology Education Initiative (GEEI)

        A program within UMass/Boston School for the Environment

Summer-Fall, 2018

​

"W-earth the slow scroll, the read, the sharing..."

​

*******

“What I stand for is what I stand on…”  Wendell Berry, writer/farmer/poet

The education imperative: 

Teaching and practicing earth-centered ethics

by Douglas Zook

      In interactions with teenagers and young people generally through the Global Ecology Education Initiative(GEEI) EarthCare program, it became clear to me what is so pro-foundly absent in both pre-college and college curriculums. Invisible to our often walled-in American cultures and narrow knowledge year after year are hundreds, indeed thousands of examples of peoples in nations around the globe who through their thinking and actions are prioritizing their Home, earth.   

      Many are indigenous leaders, as well as other peoples of color and quite often women in the lead.  While they may not use or recognize the terms “ethics” and “biosphere,” they are for the most part practicing an earth-centered ethic, that is they know that without a healthy environment (biosphere), there is at best a tenuous today and a tragic tomorrow.  They know that the human species and many essential life forms (bees/whales/butterflies) and ecosystems  (rainforests/estuaries/lakes) are symbiotically intertwined as a kind of intimate ecology that remains disrespected within our ways of thinking and believing, i.e. our ethics.

     Ethics and its companion “ethos"  has historically and to this moment been a human superiority-centered modus operandi.  We still substantially function and believe within the echoes of well-known western hemisphere philosophers/thinkers of the 17th and 18th centuries:

     “The world is made for man…”  Francis Bacon

     “We (humans) are the lords and possessors of nature…”  René Descartes

     "All things are made for the sake of Man.”  C. Linnaeus

     “Man has rendered the earth more proper” 

             Montesquieu

geei board presentation 8.jpg

These are among the many leaders in countries around the world promoting and practicing an earth-centered ethic.  Many are recipients of the Goldman Environmental Prize.  Such leaders and grassroots efforts need to be a part of high school, university, and community education curricula.                                   

     We now know with substantial microbial fossil evidence in western Australia that life originated here on earth at least 3.6 billion years ago and that the major and even complex advanced systems for life were well established more than 2 billion years ago, including photosynthesis, upon which every human and nearly all species depend on each day.  Indeed, most of the “inventions” which are the staple of our life -- motility, respiration, gene transfers, metabolism, sex -- were not only established in that distant time but central to a successful flourishing earth long before even the first mammal, insect, flower or bird.  If we make the span of life on earth equivalent to a ten mile ribbon, modern Homo sapiens' arrival, such as from the start of the Industrial Age (circa 1840) would be a mere thread at the ribbon edge.  Despite being the ultimate latecomer, so many humans today continue to ignore Nature and its profound experience and “wisdom.”  Yet, there are many peoples who understand the importance of humility and who know that we must be working not to control, conquer, or even manage “the environment”, but seek out and practice how best to fit in with the biosphere’s rules and systems.

      A powerful way to engage any potential learner including and perhaps most importantly young people, is not only to share relevancy of the subject matter --  in this case of developing essential earth-centered ethics -- with them but to inspire by visually and interactively showcasing actual practitioners. Young people through education in and out of school need to see specific peoples in many different cultures/nations worldwide living and working to build a healthy community that is compatible with a having a future, that is something sustainable. This educational focus is essential for the future wheel to keep turning.  Our continued ignorance of this need in public and private schooling at all levels is one of the most serious threats to a viable future for youth.

     It is time to priority-push for student curriculum and courses to include Nobel Prize recipient the late Wangari Maathai and Green Belt Movement of Kenya; Bunker Roy and the Barefoot College of the Himalayas;  Ruth Buendia and the Asháninka peoples of Peru; Nohra Padilla of Colombia; Aleta Baun and the Mollo peoples of Timor Indonesia; Humberto Rios Labrada, Cuba;  Marc Ona, Gabon; the late Berta Cacéras, Honduras; Jaime Lerner, Brazil; Berito Kuwari and the U’Wa peoples of Colombia; and/or many, many others. 

     Our admittedly “little” speck", Global Ecology Education Initiative EarthCare program, seeks to continue do its part in promoting this educational imperative, not only by the periodic school visits locally but with a planned interactive, curriculum-friendly web site accessible  for teachers and their students anywhere.  

     This kind of essential earth-centered and eco-sustainable curriculum advocacy has the added correlating benefit of helping young people and future generations to be more geography- and culture-literate as well as respectful.  There is no controversy over the fact that American students (and often their parents) at various levels are among the most illiterate in the world when it comes to knowing where  other countries are located, why they are important, what kinds of cultural practices and ideas are there and so on.  Thus, the whole theme of the EarthCare earth-centered message serves as a positive educational counterpoint to the various government, corporate and even citizen attacks on the environment and climate science, the demeaning of other nations and peoples, the ignorance about indigenous peoples and their history,  the belittling of biodiversity, and the illegitimacy of touting the United States above the nations of the world.  Global Ecology and earth-centered ethics education is tantamount to a healthy educational revolution for this land, and it can start by not only entering into conversation but even more impactful as part of  middle/high school, university and adult education curricula.

Consider supporting the effort today by following the easy steps at this EarthCare giver web site:  

https://dpzook.wixsite.com/earthcaregiving

The growing bicycling culture – transporting us to a safer daily use and to a healthier, more sustainable future

by Laura Borrelli and Thomas McNulty

​

      I (Laura) was never interested in “politics.” I accepted early on that politics was a category of things-- people, policies, laws, bills, procedures -- that just went over my head. I assumed there was an underdeveloped part of my brain, making it impossible for me to comprehend, keep up with, or even care about anything regarding what people were calling “political conversations.” It wasn't until my mid-20s, while dating a self-described “politically-charged” person, that we got in a heated conversation about a social issue and he said to me, "You realize, Laura, that you're talking about politics right now? This is what politics is."

      Fast forward almost 10 years. It was September 1, I was getting ready for the new school year at the local high school where I teach Advanced Placement Biology. Running errands, I was riding my bicycle on Beacon Street in Somerville, MA, when suddenly my path was blocked by a car door. I hit the door, flipped over the handlebars, and landed on my shoulder and hands. I ended up with some scrapes and bruises and ruined a dress I was wearing for the first time. The driver gave me a ride to the bike shop, where he paid for my repairs.

      I was lucky. Extremely lucky. My story is trivial, while many others are deadly. In June of that school year, less than a half-mile from my crash, 27-year-old Amanda Phillips swerved to avoid getting "doored" and instead was hit by a truck passing her too closely. That bicycle ride ended up being her last, as she died a short time later. A neighbor of mine heard Amanda’s bloodcurdling scream as she met her unexpected death, and that neighbor was so struck by the sound of that scream, and shaken at the thought of her own children riding bikes on those same streets one day, that she got herself involved in bike advocacy right then and there and helped organize the Ghost Bike Memorial Ceremony for Amanda. Ghost bikes, which can be found around the world, are roadside memorials involving stripped-down bikes painted white, erected in memory of cyclists killed while cycling. They are usually located at the location of the cyclists’ crash.

      By the time of Amanda Phillips' death, I had already immersed myself into the bicycle advocacy community, driven by my own, less serious, dooring incident. I found myself welcomed with open arms into a multi-layered community of brilliant, passionate cyclists who prioritize safety on the streets. The bike advocacy community of Boston, Cambridge, and Somerville includes groups ranging from a few members, such as the Ghost Bike Planning Committee, to a few thousand, like MassBike Coalition. Some groups, like the Somerville Bike Committee and the Cambridge Bike Safety Group, focus on influencing city decisions such as making road infrastructure changes, while other groups, like the Boston Bike Party Community, organize massive costumed bike rides around town. At the start of that school year, fueled by my crash, I started up a bike advocacy student group, the Cambridge Rindge and Latin School  Student Bike Advocates, and managed to gather a small group of students interested in promoting bicycle safety throughout the school where, we discovered, over 300 students rode their bikes to school throughout the year.

      While I (Thomas) have been lucky enough not to have been in a serious crash, there have been multiple times in my life where I have been incredibly close to experiencing what a lot of City bikers classify as right of passage experiences. Things like being doored, having cars drive far too close to me, having to brake at an intersection when I have the right of way, and more, are things that bikers accept as normal, when in reality they are far from it. There's a blatant lack of respect for bikers by some motorists likely because of an entitlement that they feel for owning a car, and having places to be which, in their minds, supersede others. 

     There are a wide range of organizations advocating for safer streets not only in the Boston/Cambridge/Somerville area but in various cities in the nation. Many bike advocates share similar human-centric practical reasons for their ethical decision-making to ride a bike and promote safe bicycling in their communities. But when it comes to Earth-centered ethical decision-making, there's a powerful argument for prioritizing biking as well!

     How does cycling affect the world in the long run? By converting a small number of people who drive cars to cycling we prevent the emissions of  tonnes of carbon dioxide/yr. Such a conversion means theoretically that millions of gallons of fossil fuel are kept out of the amosphere depending on how many people convert to cycling. Cars and trucks account for much of the USA emissions.  Clearly, by cutting down on the amount of people driving and the number of hours people drive, we can greatly reduce the damage we are doing to the biosphere. It’s projected  that, worldwide, motorists will account for â…“ of carbon emissions by 2050. 

 

laura1.jpg

Laura Borrelli is a biology teacher at Cambridge Rindge and Latin high school, Cambridge, MA where she also advises the student bike advocates group. She lives in Somerville, where she participates in various other bike advocacy groups and causes and plays drums in an activist marching band, “Second Line Social Aid and Pleasure Society Brass Band”

thomas1.jpg

Thomas McNulty is a senior at Cambridge Rindge and Latin high school and former AP  Biology student of Ms. Borrelli. He plans to enter Boston College for biology studies in the Fall.      

Edward Lamson Henry - The New Woman.jpg

"The New Woman," a painting by Edward Lamson Henry, 1892

      Additionally, the amount of privately-owned cars is estimated to triple in that same time frame. The actual carbon cost of bikes is relatively insignificant when compared to cars.  The average energy to construct a bicycle uses about 530 lbs of greenhouse gases compared to the 6,000+ lbs used in the construction of some cars. This is not to mention the cost of energy-intensive maintainance of roads that are subject to the heavier weight of cars compared to bikes.

      Many people  who drive electric and hybrid cars overlook the carbon cost of what makes them unique - its  batteries. The construction of its lithium ion batteries and materials can be very harmful for the environment. To actually harvest those materials used in the lithium ion batteries and other parts of the car requires intensive mining offshore, producing even more carbon dioxide emissions.  And, while we like to think of electric cars as eco-friendly, depending on how your community produces electricity, electric cars can in some cases be nearly equivalent to the regular car.

      Nevertheless, it is actually quite difficult to accurately quantify how much a cycling lifestyle saves in carbon emissions. It’s not as simple as approximating that each mile or km ridden by a bike saves the pound of carbon that could otherwise be emitted by a car. In-depth studies attempt to  take into account variables such as the infrastructure that supports cars (car washes,  tire stores, etc.), the attraction of road users based on the road infrastructure a city provides (many car lanes, wide bike lanes, etc.), whether or not cyclists respire more, eat more, make different food choices, and/or live longer, to name just a few.

      But according to Lewis Fulton, transportation researcher at University of California, Davis, and the Director of STEPS (Sustainable Transportation Energy Pathways) and a speaker at the most recent Climate Change Summit in Paris, cycling can play a big role -- perhaps one of the greatest impacts -- in combating global warming. He estimates that an 11% reduction in carbon emissions from “urban passenger transport” could come about by 2050 if only the number of daily urban bicycle travelers in the US and Canada was increased to 20-30%.

      For years  countries in the European Union have been experimenting with increased biking. Culturally, biking is seen more favorably in many countries there.  Indeed, the impact of the change as to the preferred mode of transportation has been quite astounding. Citizens in the EU in year 2000, for example,  biked an estimated  whopping 71 billion kilometers, cutting their greenhouse gas (GHG) output by an estimated 3-6%.  This is not to mention the GHG’s saved in not having to repair the roads as frequently,  as well as saved in the production of what would have been cars, but instead were bikes.

      So why can’t we replicate this in the United States and turn Lewis Fulton’s estimation into a reality? Well, according to city planner Jeff Speck, author of the acclaimed book, Walkable City (2012), the reason has to do with “today’s landscape of disassociated professions and special interests that determine the shape of our communities.” He goes on to explain that if cities were designed by generalists, there would be more acknowledgement of certain facts, including my favorite: “More lanes usually just lead to more traffic.” This can be applied to both car lanes leading to more car traffic, and more bike lanes leading to more bike traffic. Unfortunately, the former is what is seen more often.

      Bicycle use, and especially prioritizing them in city planning  can combat human-influenced climate change.  Whether realized by each rider or not, regular bicycle  users are making impacts beyond local transportation for commuting and recreational purposes. Rather they are promoting key sustainable practices, that is,  helping to build a more compatible future with and for the biosphere.  And, spreading the word on the value of bicycles is growing.  One Jamaica Plain/Boston-based organization, Bikes Not Bombs, has shipped 70,000 bicycles to 14 countries in Central America and Africa, some destined for repurposing as grain mills, coffee-bean deshellers, and corn dekernelers. The bicycle, invented in Germany in the early 1800’s, is one of the most efficient human-powered machines ever made, so it’s not unreasonable to think it can be used for many purposes - purposes that can literally mean a much less threatening future for all of us.

Resources 

     _wheels_vs_four.html

********

Personal remembrances of yesterday’s courage and commitment -- needed today more than ever

by Douglas Zook

Bill Homans, civil rights attorney (1922-1997)

      Spanning four decades, there was not a more compassionate and impactful lawyer in the Nation, especially for those marginalized, ill-treated, or actively protesting systemic injustices.  His quiet demeanor in the courtroom provided impressive but underplayed drama as he strode in with his tall, dignified, and commanding appearance, often wrestling with papers, pausing often and looking pensive.  The very definition of a workaholic, by the time of his passing at 75 he had made a lasting impact on thousands of forever unknowns and needy tangled in wrongdoing or the perception of such and millions of citizens generally through his representation of the people working to make a difference in society and for a more just  future. 

     Historic examples of the latter include as a co-defense attorney of Vietnam war conscientious objectors and protesters including pediatrician Benjamin Spock, Rev. William Sloan Coffin, Michael Goodman and Michael Ferber among others.  Ferber’s main “crime” was giving a now famous speech, “A Time to Say No” at the Arlington Street Church in Boston’s Back Bay, a sanctuary for protesters against the continued senseless US war in Asia.  In the speech, he called for “the loudest No our government has ever heard” much like the non-violent but disruptive methods advocated by Martin Luther King and others practicing active democracy. In a later address before tens of thousands on Boston Common in the Spring of 1968, Ferber pronounced words that ring strong to this day, “We will no longer be just a problem troubling the sleep of men waging this war and dreaming up the next one, we will be their nightmare.” There was hardly a day over a revolutionary six year period (1967-1973)  that there were not scores of major protests and civil disobedience over the War, racism, and the immoral and inequitable empire-building system.  Homans’ consistent, astute legal aid, much of the time without compensation, on behalf of legitimate, insightful protesters, aka civilians, contributed to his reputation as the “peoples’ justice” lawyer.  This played out also  in more localized community protests of the time (1970), including arrests in Boston’s

homans 1.jpg

pre-gentrified remarkably multi-racial/ethnic South End (not to be confused with South Boston). There, community citizens overwhelmingly called for a different urban renewal program that did not mean the removal of low-income people to be replaced by housing unaffordable to longtime residents and recent immigrants. In a civil disobedience demonstration, community citizens seized an empty townhouse building on Tremont Street leading to police action at the  site. 

     I was among the four arrested, and Bill Homans despite encumbered by dozens of other cases, agreed to serve for the defense upon the request of longtime respected community groups.  In the dramatic trial, in which the police falsely stated that the protesters had assaulted the officers, Homans effectively countered by gaining important photos from a Globe photographer who had been covering the “squatter’s” demonstration. The chief police officer had claimed that the assault could be proven by his broken eyeglasses that he said were knocked off his face by protesters and found at the scene.  But the photos showed they were instead actually dropped by him on the stairs as part of the arrest and then stepped on accidentally by one of the officers.  Later Homans was able to reduce my civil disobedience trespassing time at Charles Street Jail to less than a month, rightly claiming that the intent to call attention to the injustices committed to citizens in the community was on a moral high ground. Later at a thank you community meeting that Homans attended with great humility, he was given through funds raised an expenses paid vacation trip.  That said, knowing his relentless schedule and near obsession with “being there” for those in need, I am not sure if he ever took that trip....

         (For more on his life, see this book which helped me to construct this piece:, see  William P. Homans, Jr., A Life in Court by Mark S. Brodin, Vandeplas Publishing, 2010)

js cu on stoop.jpg

Jackie Shearer, pioneering documentary film-maker and civil rights advocate (1947-1993)

     Emerging from the very modest community offices of Blackside in Boston’s South End, founder and filmmaker Henry Hampton, spurred by his recollections of the attacks on African American citizens protesting the continued severe racial discrimination in Selma and other cities years earlier, initiated the now historic “Eyes on the Prize” 14-part riveting and comprehensive film documentary history of the civil rights movement.  To this day, it remains the standard by which civil rights and indeed comprehensive documentaries in general can be judged, for it relies on original prime sources, revealing thoughtful footage, and well-researched examples. 

   Among the acclaimed segments were those co-directed by the dedicated, focused filmmaker Jackie Shearer,  who in her shortened career elevated the emerging recognition of African-American women in the creative film arts.  Hampton’s Blackside production that was seen first in 1989 by millions on  PBS across America and even overseas featured two powerful segments directed by Jackie with Paul Stekler, “The Keys to the Kingdom” about the Boston desegregation-busing crisis and the widely renowned “The Promised Land,” featuring Martin Luther King Jr’s profound leadership in promoting the poor peoples’ campaign and shifting the tide to a broader reach by opposing openly the continued US government warfare abroad and at home. The “Eyes on the Prize” series including Jackie’s extraordinary episodes that received the coveted Peabody award for Distinguished, Outstanding Achievement in Public Television Broadcasting, Program of the Year from the Television Critics Association, and two Emmy's.    

      Many years earlier in 1969, within the all-pervasive creativity and actions to foster

revolutionary change, and intense daily protests to confront social, economic and environmental issues, there emerged Newsreel, a documentary film group featuring so called "leftist" values based in Cambridge, MA. Jackie saw this venture and her work with non-profit Urban Planning Aid as a way to get community groups and citizens in marginalized communities to be more media- and communications- literate so to  help empower and bring about the necessary social justice changes. She developed an African American-focused public affairs program on the legendary WBCN radio and produced programs such as “Third World" on the local ABC network affiliate.  As noted in the book by Spencer Moon, Reel Black Talk, “…She was astutely aware of the problems faced by women and other people of color…whom she mentored and often advised on fundraising and even how to direct film crews."

   I first met Jackie in those early Newsreel days in the heart of those very tumultuous but inspirational times. We crossed paths periodically in Boston’s South End, as well as in Cambridge.  As was commonplace among the mass movement for systemic changes, we would mutually encourage each other about keeping up the struggle against the economic inequities, war, and racism in those challenging days.

       Jackie’s dedication, consistent low-key leadership for over two

Jackie with atlanta Mayor Jackson.jpg

decades evenually resulted in not only the historic Eyes on the Prize segments she directed and produced with Paul Stekler as highlighted earlier,  but also her directing and producing the “The Colored 54th regiment,” a PBS American Experience special in 1993.  As part of a keynote speech at a video distributions conference in California just a year prior to her death from colon cancer at age 46, Jackie was firm about always being sure that the message is made to reach the audience, especially on the community level: “Film has no potential merit gathering dust on a shelf…It is only its interaction with audience that it then has power.”

Sincere gratitude to outstanding, creative artists Paul Stekler and Lillian Benson for their photos and encouragement

**********

Jackie in 1988 interviewing Maynard Jackson Jr., ihe first African-American Mayor of Atlanta (elected in 1973) or any other major southern city, Interview was part of the screenplay development for the

Eyes on the Prize..  

Phil Bradley, community organizer and low-         income housing advocate (1944-1981)          

phil bradley demo.jpg

     In the late 1960s and extending into the early 1970s Boston’s lower-income, multi-racial South End was part of an often misguided urban renewal program.  We used to say and it rings true often today in communities around the Nation, “urban renewal means urban people removal.”  The erroneous notion that a community can only be viable and have a sound future through substantial influx of higher income individuals, often called the middle class, became a giant opportunity in the minds of real estate speculators and developers.  Hence, longtime low-income residents as well as legal, society-contributing immigrants saw rents suddenly rise that they could not afford and in many cases eviction notices to clean out buildings were administered so that renovations to attract higher income clientele could be initiated. 

    This gentrification, along with other unjust actions and policies, was fought vigorously by thousands of  South End and lower Roxbury citizens.  Among the many dedicated to stemming the takeover was justice-advocate and friend, Phil Bradley.  Phil joined in with Israel Feliciano, Rev. William Dwyer, and many others to create the grassroots Emergency Tenants Council (ETC, later known as IBA, Inquilinos Boricuas en Accion or Puerto Rican Tenants in Action). The effort was dedicated to developing affordable, quality housing for marginalized and victimized community citizens, many of whom Puerto Rican.  Through protests, meetings, negotiations, fundraising, the original City and Federal urban renewal plans became challenged.  As Israel Feliciano wrote to the Boston Redevelopment

Phil shown in the middle here at one of many protests in the South End community of Boston in the late sixties and early seventies for greater community control, no more people-removal, and more affordable housing 

Authority at that time, “We want responsibility to determine our destiny. We are tired of other people making our decisions…We are not going to move….” Eventually what emerged was Villa Victoria, a low-income housing and cultural/arts center that features still today nearly 50  years later 435 affordable units and serves as a lasting model nationally and internationally  of what can emerge through grassroots-citizens’ struggle, courage, and creative planning.   Phil was relentlessly dedicated to community justice issues and joined me and several others in being elected by South End citizens to the South End Project Area Committee, one of the first grassroots community organizations in the nation to be allowed a degree of veto power by the City after numerous protests.

     Phil was a congenial, warm person, but when called for he knew the importance of being probing, tough-minded, and never fearful of questioning establishment  authority.  Perhaps most importantly, he understood and practiced the notion that lasting change usually requires the relentless interaction of evidence of need, feet walking in protest, of voices clear and raised, and a heart and mindset of courage.  Time of course buries conversations but I do recall one of the last times I saw Phil on Shawmut Ave around 1973 and he said with remarkable enthusiasm, “We’re really doing it…We just have to keep it up….!’  Phil later was a continuing leader in IBA including in organizing social services, planning and overseeing  the new housing and policies, and a constant advocate for too-often marginalized citizens.  Phil died of cancer in 1981 at the age of 37.

35345-B8-F026-VI-VN_00004A.jpg

Villa Victoria low-income housing neighborhood, including hundreds of affordable units for residents as seen here in the mid- fore-ground amongst the trees. A determined community led by many Puerto Rican residents and other leaders such as Phil Bradley fought for this result starting in 1968, and it remains a model of healthy urban development that emerged from grassroots courage, commitment, and talent. 

"Those tree-huggers...!"

Often used derogatorily, in reality it

represents "great courage"

big_chipko_movement_1522047126.jpg
**********

 by Douglas Zook 

  

     In his extensive travels and exploration in South America, Alexander von Humboldt in February, 1800 saw that Lake Valencia in the Aragua region of Venezuela was, much as the local indigenous peoples had shown, losing its water. He accurately pointed out that the removal of trees in the vast nearby hillsides and replacing them with much smaller less rooted indigo plants for dye-making resulted in the water loss as well as loss of nutrients.  Without thousands of trees in a forest with its deep and extensive root systems and soil organisms, the rich soils would wash down into lower regions such as lakes and river valleys, thus drastically altering water tables and the surrounding ecosystem. This, he noticed as he ventured into other regions, was a commonplace error, "By felling the trees that cover the tops and sides of mountains," he admonished, "men in every climate prepare at once for two calamities, scarcity of fuel, and scarcity of water..."  

      As the lure of capitalism grew in the 19th century, this massive tree removal for cash crop agriculture and various engineering projects only further reinforced those early ecology warnings.  Thus, since then, such events have been hundreds of times repeated as in July, 1970  when significant flooding occurred in the northeast regions of India at the foot of the Himalayas, especially at the many points of the 113 mile Alakananda River.  Because of the removal of major forest regions, rains not only wash away healthy soil down the hillsides, but the rain is no longer absorbed/held by roots and the trees' rhizosphere (the living material around the base of trees within the soil) and instead flows readily to the river, inundating agricultural areas and villages below.

     Knowing of this essential forest protection and the fact that community self-rule for proper resource management was not welcomed by government leaders, the villagers became particularly alarmed when in early 1973 the Forestry Department of India allotted forest land to be cut down for State revenue by a foreign company.  As was common, the villagers were not consulted.  Wanting control and management over their traditional lands, the protection of forests became not only an ecological issue, but a self-determination and local economy one.  With the damage caused by the floods from deforestation still on their minds, villagers in strategy meetings decided to protest by  hugging the trees en masse, putting themselves directly in the way of the lumbermen.  This was the first major action of what came to be known as the Chipko Movement, wherein "chipko" in Hindi means to embrace or hug.  At the appointed day, the various indigenous groups marched to the forest site with drums and songs.  When there, they immediately embraced the trees, sometimes forming a human chain around a tree and vowed not to let go and leave until the contracted lumbermen abandoned the project.  They refused various offers from the company and the courageous Chipko protest proved successful.

     Nevertheless, the Chipko actions had to be repeated in various locales soon after, as there were more attempts to transfer forested regions to government income generation, or as has been called a struggle of promoting a culture of economy for profits vs a culture of economy for practical local use. Perhaps the action that gained most attention and became an international symbol of grassroots courage and determination on behalf of the environment and self-determination occurred in January, 1974 when again Forestry officials set up an auction to sell off 2500 mature trees.  They attempted to avoid further Chipko tree hugging actions by instructing the men come to a distant town for long overdue compensation payments for their service in a war some years earlier.  This visit was scheduled on the day that the officials secretly arranged for the lumbermen to remove the trees.  However, with the men away that day, the lumbermen were startled to find women and children surrounding and embracing the trees that were planned to be cut.  The lumbermen left and a continuous presence was initiated by the villagers until the contractual period for the lumbermen who were hired ran out.  

     Chipko actions indeed have a long history, including a surprisingly well-documented action in 1730 in response to orders from the Maharaja of Jodhpur in Rajasthan.  The King sought to fell a large group of old Khejri trees (Prosopis cineraria) as part o the construction of his new palace.  To the indigenous villagers in the Bishnoi district, these trees and indeed the forest was not only important for practical survival purposes but sacred as well.  A village woman Amrita Devi and her three daughters physically embraced and clung to the trees.  They were attacked and killed by the King's men....As the story goes, scores of other villagers came, to protect the sacred trees and were also killed. Once the Maharaj heard of the sacrifice by the Amrita and the other villagers, he ordered his men to abandon the tree felling.     
     The Chipko history, particularly the actions of the 1970's in India, had an impact

 

9159758594_082899faec.jpg
flooding-in-india-pakistan.jpg

in India that led to various new forest/environment protection rules, albeit many of these have not been reinforced and expanded in the recent decades.  In some ways, the Chipko movement's greatest impact has been internationally, as those seeking a sustainable future and evolving an essential biosphere-centered ethic remain inspired by courageous action on behalf of arguably our best friends, trees.  The Chipko actions of the '70's came at a time when the value of the earth for many around the world was being much more prioritized,  and in that context, it helped to place women front and center as caring, courageous embracers of nature.

     Bottom line, the next time you hear "tree-hugger" mentioned in a derogatory or belittling context (and it may not necessarily be always someone from the  Trumpite cult), signifying someone   being soft, wimpy, weak...whatever, know that the reality is a long history of such action being not only a principled stand that values the environment and our future, but a poignant act of powerful courage.  A true badge of honor.

Selected Resources

...​Indigenous environmental activism in India:  The Chipko movement by Phoebe Yetley

 2014 University of Iowa History Corps     http://thestudio.uiowa.edu/historycorps/exhibits/show/indigenousstruggles1900/chipko

...Standing up for trees: Women's role in the Chipko movement by Jain Shobita. 1984 http://www.fao.org/docrep/R0465E/R0465E03.HTM 

...Hugging the Trees:  The story of the Chipko movement by T. Weber, Viking Press 1988

Women in 1974 engaged in chipko to protect the trees and the local villagers' right to determine their own land use.

Major floods in northeastern India, caused in part by regional defores-tation policies and practices, led to later Chipko actions.

Weak forest protection worldwide coupled with storm intensities due to anthropogenic climate change are causing increased flooding as in this view during 2013 extreme weather along the India-Pakistan border.

****

The Case for Offshore Wind

by Lucas Stegman

3105315_Wind-farm-turbines-offshore-rene

      On May 23rd New England’s status as a pioneer of offshore wind in America was confirmed. Massachusetts and Rhode Island awarded separate contracts to construct and operate offshore wind facilities1. Combined, the two projects will power approximately 900,000 New England homes.(2) 

        We live in a world under threat from anthropogenic climate change, habitat destruction, and pollution. A large-scale offshore wind farm, the first of its size in the United States1, is the starting point for a more sustainable future.(1) Yet, there seems to be a reluctance to embrace offshore wind as a viable energy source. Over the past year, I’ve taken an interest in offshore wind both personally and professionally and want to respond to three of the common ‘myths’ about offshore wind.

​

Myth: Offshore Wind Isn’t A Realistic Source Of Power on a Large Scale

Fact: Offshore Wind Could Be Used to Power the Entire Nation

      While the United States certainly has a higher energy consumption than any European nation(3), it also has a massive, windy coastline with an incredible amount of generation potential(4). In fact, the United States has

the potential offshore wind resources to meet double the electricity demands of the entire nation(5).

      We now have the chance to build that infrastructure and join other nations that have embraced offshore wind. In Europe, offshore wind energy is a booming business: Some nations, such as Denmark(6) have met almost a quarter of their electricity demand with offshore wind energy. So think of what we could accomplish.  The potential to rewrite the U.S. energy economy is just offshore.

Myth: Offshore Wind Is Terrible For Wildlife

Fact: Offshore Wind Can Be Developed Sustainably and Do Less Harm to Wildlife than Fossil Fuels

      One of the most common criticisms of offshore wind energy is that it will prove devastating to wildlife. However, all forms of energy generation have negative impacts on the environment and offshore wind turbines appear to be among the least damaging.  Of course, it’s important that offshore wind project developers operate under appropriate conditions to protect important habitats and the marine and bird species that utilize them. There are also clear ways to make wind turbines more wildlife-friendly. For example, postponing construction during whale migration season can minimize harm to whale populations (8,9).

     In terms of birds, there are far more pressing threats to avian biodiversity. For instance, according to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, feral cats kill approximately 5000 times the amount of birds annually as do wind turbines. Other causes of mortality, including building strikes, poison, vehicles, and oil pits also dwarf the number of birds killed by wind turbines(10). Additionally, there are ways to build turbines more sustainably including (11,12):

  • Changing the color of the turbine lights

  • Altering the operation of the wind turbines during bad weather

  • Leaving ‘flight path’ corridors unobstructed for migratory birds.

 

      The argument that offshore wind is terrible for wildlife ignores two of the primary drivers of biodiversity loss: habitat destruction and climate change. In the construction of a terrestrial power plant, large areas of wildlife habitat are often destroyed, but this isn’t the case on the water.

Finally, the threat to biodiversity from climate change cannot be overstated. Anthropogenic climate shifts have been shown to cause everything from coral bleaching to changing migration patterns, from shifts in sea turtle mating methods to expansion of disease-carrying insects(13, 14,15). It is the greatest threat facing the Earth's long-standing ecosystems and many organisms including humans and will as numerous studies show most certainly get worse before it gets better. We need to address this problem NOW- and reducing our fossil fuel dependence via wind power is a significant start.

Myth: Offshore Wind Costs More Than It Is Worth

            Fact: Offshore Wind Is A Smart Investment

            Despite the argument that offshore wind is too expensive, it’s a plain fact that renewables are cheaper than ever and continually getting even cheaper. According to the U.S. Energy Information Administration, the cost of renewables including onshore wind and solar renewables have fallen drastically since 2010. And the cost of other renewables, including offshore wind, are projected to fall steadily over the next few decades (16,17)..

            As wind farms grow more numerous and turbines more efficient, the cost of energy to consumers will fall. Some nations, like Germany, have committed to build offshore infrastructure each year until 2030(6). Other nations, like the USA, are just now realizing the potential of offshore wind and this will greatly reduce construction costs.

The Future of Offshore Wind in the USA

            It’s an exciting time to be an offshore wind enthusiast. Not only have Massachusetts and Rhode Island committed to construction of the first large-scale plants in the nation, but other states including Maryland, New York, New Jersey, and North Carolina have also begun the process. It’s not hard to imagine that in the lifetimes of children today offshore wind will be one of the most important sources of energy for the nation  - a reliable and sustainable source.

Citations

  1. Boston Globe. https://www.bostonglobe.com/business/2018/05/23/two-big-wind-farms-rise-off-coast-martha-vineyard/vLmWsUSdLzrh6M3CCZK2YL/story.html

  2. California Energy. http://www.energy.ca.gov/glossary/ISO_GLOSSARY.PDF

  3. Energy Information Association. https://www.eia.gov/beta/international/

  4. National Renewable Energy Laboratory. http://rredc.nrel.gov/wind/pubs/atlas/maps/chap2/2-01m.html

  5. U.S. Department of Energy. https://www.energy.gov/eere/articles/computing-america-s-offshore-wind-energy-potential

  6. Wind Europe Key Trends & Statistics. https://windeurope.org/wp-content/uploads/files/about-wind/statistics/WindEurope-Annual-Offshore-Statistics-2017.pdf

  7. Bailey, H., Brookes, K., & Thompson, P. (2014). Assessing environmental impacts of offshore wind farms:lessons learned and recommendations for the future. Aquatic Biosystems. 10: 8 https://aquaticbiosystems.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/2046-9063-10-8

  8. Kraus SD, Leiter S, Stone K, Wikgren B, Mayo C, Hughes P, Kenney RD, Clark CW, Rice AN, Estabrook B, andTielens J (2016). Northeast Large Pelagic Survey Collaborative Aerial and Acoustic Surveys for Large Whales andSea Turtles. Final Report. US Department of the Interior, Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, Sterling, Virginia.OCS Study BOEM 2016-054. 117 pp. + appendices.

  9. Deepwater Wind. http://dwwind.com/press/deepwater-wind-conservation-law-foundation-reach-agreement-protect-right-whales-block-island-wind-farm-construction/

  10. U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service. https://www.fws.gov/birds/bird-enthusiasts/threats-to-birds.php

  11. Bevanger 1994. Ibis. . https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1474-919X.1994.tb01116.x

  12. Marques et al. 2014. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S000632071400305X

  13. European Commision. https://ec.europa.eu/clima/change/consequences_en

  14. Conserve Turtles.org https://conserveturtles.org/information-sea-turtles-threats-climate-change/

  15. Miller-Rushing et al. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2008.01619.x

  16. U.S. Energy Information Administration. https://www.eia.gov/outlooks/archive/aeo15/electricity_generation.cfm

Alternative Energy Institute. http://info.aee.net/hubfs/PDF/RE-EE-Competitiveness-Exec-Summ.pdf

​

lucas photo.jpg

        Lucas, shown here at the Boston Common March for Science rally in 2017, considers the protection of nature and wild species to be the highest priority and one that we can all work towards. Growing up on the Jersey Shore, Lucas moved to Massachusetts to study neuroscience and ecology at Boston University.  He was an outstanding student in Professor Zook's Global Ecology course.  He has since obtained a Master’s degree in Conservation Medicine from Tufts and intends to pursue a career in law.

 *******

As part of the Save the Rivers Coalition, "River Sisters" 

lead dramatic demonstrations in Poland

Sisters Rivers Ciechocinek  2018 fot. To
river sisters.jpg

     The iconic free-spirit of the North American west, Edward Abbey, wrote many years ago, "I choose to listen to the river for a while, thinking river thoughts, before joining the night and the skies..."  But in a large nation, Poland, that still features much magnificent natural land and waterscapes, Law and Order party government leaders are planning massive dredging, altering, and industrializing of rivers and without regard to local citizen ideas and desires.

     This emerging policy has further angered a growing segment of the population, as evidenced by remarkable protest demonstrations designed to promote more attention among the general citizenry on the critical importance of free-flowing, untamed, healthy rivers. Part of the country's Save the Rivers Coalition, the "River Sisters" made up of mothers justifiably concerned about the the vitality of their children's future as well as the threats to the present, created signs, each with the name of one of Poland's many precious rivers.  Through these visual expressions, each woman was functioning as an active ambassador on behalf of a different river system of Poland.

      Led by creative artists Cecylia Malik and  Anna Grajewska, who are dedicated to promoting a more sustainable nature-respecting nation, their rallies included one near Kraków and then one in the water at Ciechoncinek, as shown in the photo above on the right. This river region is the site of one of the Polish government's 36 planned dams.   A centerpiece of the overall waterway plans are to develop and alter the far-reaching and pervasive Vistula (also "Wisla") and Oder Rivers.  The Vistula is one of Europe's, indeed the world's, great rivers.  It flows 635 miles from the foothills of southern Poland's Tatras mountains north to the Baltic Sea at Gdansk.  Unique in many ways, importantly it is one of Europe's only rivers that still

640px-Vistula_river_map.png

features many parts in a natural ecosystem-supporting state. For example, it flows through twenty sites analyzed for their natural beauty and ecosystem importance by the European Natura 2000 Commission, as well as 16 nature reserves, 5 landscape parks, and 13 protected landscape regions.  The Government plans seek to revise his historic river to become a dredged, widened major waterway for the transport of goods, coal, and masses of people to compete with rail lines.  

     A major construction through important ecosystems includes the construction of a canal connecting the Vistula to the Odra River.  As a report by Ewa Sufin-Jacquemart and Radoslaw Gawk in the Green European Journal (Volume 14, "Cry me a River: Poland's threatened waterways") states:  (Neither at the surface nor below) "Poland does not have much water.  Its water reserves are among the lowest in Europe....the inland river navigation system will rob other sectors of water they need and cause shortages of drinking water and conflicts over water.....Moreover, Poland currently generates 88% of its electricity via coal-fired plants, where water is necessary to cool the installations."

     Scientists also warn that as the climate crisis worsens with likely droughts in the region, this could lead to not only greater river disruption but the development of costly field irrigation systems.  As one scientific report concludes, "There is a real risk that Poland's rivers will be turned into expensively built canals -- without water."

      The list of dangers can read like a recipe for ecological catastrophe, including greater pollution in rivers and associated wetlands, loss of fish and other water-dwellers as well as riparian wildlife, loss of plant diversity which translates to loss of pollinators necessary for agriculture and ecosystem health, microbial community disruption, less of human recreation areas, noisy pollution, expensive and often unworkable flood control, and so on.   

      Rivers are in many ways a grand expression of global ecology, for they are all part of the water-based network of the biosphere.  The heroic work and commitment of the "River Sisters", the Save the Rivers Coalition and Euro Dam Removal are clear examples of functioning with a strong earth-centered ethic.  (Article by D. Zook)

For more information as well as support these efforts contact koalicja@ratujmyrzeki.org.pl and check out these links.:

https://damremoval.eu

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC_qrW98Yj2IBI5I--MHOpsQ (speaking in Polish but with English subtitles)

http://www.ratujmyrzeki.pl/dysk_KRR/dokumenty/EN_Deklaracja-KRR_2017.08.03_Declaration-Of-The-Save-The-Rivers-Coalition.pdf

wisla at tynniec.jpg
#15Dactylorhiza maculata.jpg

A part of the Wisla River flowing gently by the 13th Century Benedictine Abbey at Tyniec, near Kraków.  A great variety of species

are threatened by the destructive river development plans...including meadow-dwelling ones such as the butterfly Polyommatus icarus (the European blue) and the orchid Dactylorhiza maculata (spotted orchid). Photos by D. Zook

#16Polyommatus icarus.jpg

**********

Local television “meteorologists” continue to ignore the dangerous anthropogenic climate crisis

by Douglas Zook     

       Many of us tune in the various local channels just prior to and after storms to get an often important dose of television weather forecasters.  While each have their own styles and expertise, there is one glaring characteristic that these individuals remarkably hold in common:  Climate change or what is more appropriately called “the climate crisis,” is not mentioned, let alone, recognized.

       Yes, weather is different from climate.  Weather of course is the short-term conditions in the atmosphere, including its interactions with the oceans and land.  It involves the daily, weekly and even year-to-year analysis of temperature, humidity, dew point  air pressure, and so on.  Climate involves these weather events but specifically revealed as patterns of expression usually extending over many years, often a decade or more.

         Scientists in overwhelming numbers, as evidenced in highly respected Federal agencies such as National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA,) as well as the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) representing thousands of scientists, see human-influenced climate change as very dangerous today and to the future for humans and many other species with whom we supposedly share the planet. Among those fully endorsing this reality and very much involved in its continued scientific research is the American Meteorological Society (ASM).  In a 2016 comprehensive survey conductd by Dr. Ed Maibach and his team for the ASM, over 4000 professionally certified meteorologists responded.  Among the many findings similar to what has repeatedly been found with scientists in all the earth, physical and life science fields, 96% stated that climate change and the fact that the planet is warming was real and a large majority of the AMS members agreed  that human activity is causing a significant portion of the climate changes.         

        But “broadcast meteorologists”, even if they do not possess doctorate degree in meteorology, must if they consider themselves to be some category of meteorologist, represent science and the extensive evidential literature behind science as it pertains to weather and the public.  In the face of the climate crisis reality, this would even be magnified at the broadcast-entertainment level, in that they must represent the discipline to which they are a member. In the face of what we now know to be a major threat to our well being and that of our children now and in the future, their avoidance in that they only deal with weather forecasting is akin to knowledgeable

images.jpeg

Millions of dollars are spent on equipment, salaries, field reporting as part of the local television broadcast meteorology in Boston and most USA cities.  Some of that agenda must periodically include attention to what humans especially in the so-called "developed" world such as here are doing to the planet.  This is legitimate and surely essential given the rapidly evolving climate crisis and its now established clear link to weather events.  Time for broadcast meteorologists to join the scientific community as well as responsibly serve the local lay communities.                                                       

medical personnel choosing only to examine and predict the health conditions of populations they serve, but completely keep silent and uninvolved about the science that strongly indicates the causes of those ailments.  We would certainly frown on such omissions.  Or another example might be the news production and broadcasting profession.  How responsibe would it be to predict and showcase a particular disease but not mention its known cause, let alone potential remedies? That would be seen as reprehensible and not professional journalism. 

       Moreover, there are numerous times that I see a broadcast meterologist mention the position and visibility of planets such as Mars and Saturn.  This is great, but it is much less of a connection to weather and weather forecasting than connections to climate and the climate crisis.  If it is because it is safer and happier to bring up the planetary alignment as opposed to anthropogenic climate change – even though  both are about equal in certainty – then that caution/reluctance in today’s world is simply unacceptable.

         For many citizens, the only daily connection that they will directly in their minds have with science is the weather and its forecasters.  Thus, there is a disservice to the public for “broadcast meteorologists” to completely ignore in depth, verified findings showing greenhouse gas emissions and deforestation by humans influencing and in some cases causing:

  • patterns of consistent record high temperatures, historic droughts and never-before-seen extreme and repeated wildfires in vast regions out west and around the world,

  • increasingly higher tides even when there are not storms but rather due to thermal expansion of the oceans (oceans getting warmer and thus take up more space)

  • increased frequency of storms and their intensity,

  • massive increases of glacial met around the world, including significantly in Greenland and areas of the Antarctic,

  • extensive phenotypic (time-linked) shifts or mismatches in nature where for example food sources for certain key organisms are no longer synced to the arrival of the organisms that eat them, and scores of other major verifiable findings. 

     If decisions to keep local news and weather as lightweight as possible come from the corporate top, then it is the time, or long past the time for the broadcast meteorologists (and anchor news people for that matter) to join together and call for more responsible coverage of what is now extremely relevant science, not a "belief".  These overwhelming findings are not based on faith but repeated observation and testing.  To keep the status quo is not in the best interests of the public or the public’s offspring and future generations.  After all, “broadcast meteorologists” cannot be permitted to simply pick and choose what science he/she finds most comfortable with respect to “weather” and which to ignore, especially when recognition of human-influenced climate change is now on the level of recognizing gravity.  While science is never absolute, it does however rigorously indicate and verify  the most probable explanations based on extensive and ongoing data of what experts with intensive training  see and experience around us over time.

         Television forecasters have even joined in with “light” news anchor-speak, urging people to “get ready to get those air conditioners cranking as it will get quite hot tomorrow!” or “there will be tough-going upcoming with this extreme heat but mother nature is the boss here!” and many similar examples. In America alone, millions of tons of carbon are released through office and residence air conditioning to the atmosphere each year, which of course contributes toward making the atmosphere and seas warmer. A sustainable future in which our children can live and even thrive can only happen with aggressive courageous luxury reduction, including conserving energy as well as rapidly reducing fossil fuels usage/dependency and implementing alternative renewable energy .  Air conditioners strongly cool whole areas including of course near the ceiling where no humans are sitting or standing.  Targeted portable low energy fans make more sense when such cooling is required. Minimally, citizens and businesses should be required to set air conditioners at functional 75 degrees F and no lower (except in certain facilities like nursing homes where it can be somewhat lower). 

      As for “mother nature” comments, the science consensus now is that a significant per cent of these long term repeated and often record-breaking events, is due to human fossil fuel use, deforestation, unsustainable cash crops and luxury behaviors and not simply to “mother nature.” Indicating consistently “mother nature” implies that we as humans are the innocent victims or simply recipients of nature and thus inaccurately removes any potential of human responsibility.  Words do matter.  In both these examples, science again is ignored, presumably in part because it does not fit in well with the happy banter of the weather and news people and what perhaps the higher-ups and some sponsors want.  Too often, albeit not always of course, the job of the local weather and news broad-caster appears to be entertainer and happiness-giver, and again this is not responsible journalism or broadcast meteorology.

        It’s time for the American Meteorological Society to require that those using the term “meteorologists” and working in the public domain agree to recognize overwhelming science data and conclusions, especially when it pertains to the citizens being properly informed.  In the meantime, our local broadcast meteorologists hereabouts, and surely mirrored in many other regions of the nation with their omissions of “climate change” realities, must at least become a part of the greater science community. For  example, minimally, they can make reference periodically to the fact that “these long term patterns we are seeing of  increased frequency of intense storms, as the NASA and NOAA science findings show. result  significantly from continued dangerous  human activities that are fossil fuel dependent.” They can also include weather information on the water temperatures in oceanic areas where storms are increasing in strength and state its implications re: human-caused climate change. They can include a special feature each week reviewing the basic facts and data of extreme weather events around the world currently and how they fit into disturbing climate patterns that we now know result in large part from humans.   Heaven forbid too that they could occasionally speak of ways to reduce our negative contribution to our childrens' futures.        

         And, they should certainly get away from the view sometimes expressed that “we had big  storms back 100 years ago and before, since we have been keeping records.”  Yes, for sure, but no way near as frequent, and measurements show a significant difference in intensity.  And, we must remember that this wave of unprecedented global warming began at the start of the Industrial age around 1840. Coal burning was extensive here, in the Unted Kingdom and elsewhere during this massive engineering period right through the 19th century.  It is more than likely that such human greenhouse gas emissions then had detrimental affects on climate and could certainly have been a factor in warmer seas that contributed to the intensity of the 1888 hurricane for example.  Moreover, since Irish scientist John Tyndahl's historic findings in 1859 and Swedish Nobel Prize winner Svante Arrhenius' later research in 1896, we have known that the amount of carbon dioxide in a  given area significantly affects the temperature of that same area.  CO2 and temperature are correlative.

        As a science educator, global ecologist and community organizer for over three decades, I have found that many people of all ages and backgrounds actually can understand the connections between what we do in society behavior-wise and the long-term weather patterns that indicate dangerous climate changes.   There’s no excuse for notorious info-tainment so prevalent in the local news sector to continue to dominate one of the the only opportunities for responsible science to filter into the minds of the viewing public via the “meteorology” segment.  Broadcast meteorologists need not hide behind false concerns that climate change is “political,” for if so, that thinking spins nowhere in that any factual news story or the omission or inclusion on literally anything can be seen in that light. 

      Rather,  local television weather forecasters can crucially and repeatedly refer to and even integrate  key science findings on climate, clearly connected to weather.  They (and their news colleagues)  have a unique opportunity and for that matter an informational/educational responsibility  to foster very much needed climate crisis literacy with and for the public and for the future well-being of children.  It is time to use it. 

climate central org.jpeg
Oxfam_East_Africa_-_A_mass_grave_for_chi
170708141142-03-kyushu-floods-exlarge-16
980x.jpg
KingTide_LongWharf-water-1440x771.jpg

From top to bottom:  Recent and continued massive forest fires following drought and extreme heat in California; Girl in East Africa amidst many buried from prolonged intense drought last year (Oxfam photo); Recent historic floods in Japan;  Acceleration of glacial melt in Greenland; periodic flood at certain high tides at Boston's harbor walk areas, not associated with storms but rather due in part to the expansion of the oceans from increased heating.

Selected key human-influenced climate crisis facts

  • Carbon dioxide levels in the atmosphere are at the highest levels at 400 ppm in 800,000 years

  • The major greenhouse gases – carbon dioxide, nitrous oxide and methane – rose to record levels in 2017

  • Investment in renewable energy in the United States dropped by 7% in 2017

  • A new record level for the sea height was set mainly due to the higher temperatures of the water gained from human actvity use of fossil fuels.  The extreme warmer waters literally expand the volume of the sea.  This rise is without the anticipated significant effects from glacial melts at the poles.

  • Last year was the third hottest average global temperature ever recorded.

  • The last ten years have been the hottest average global temperature records ever recorded.

  • Average land surface temperature for the Arctic was recorded in 2016 as 6.3 degrees higher than 1900.

  • Data analysis studies indicate that several million people have been displaced by conditions caused in part by climate change in the last five years.  Several studies predict that within ten years, more than 100 million people will become climate change refugees worldwide. 

  • Feedback effects magnify greatly the climate extremes.  What are called “positive feedbacks” do not signify “positive” as meaning  “good” but rather means that the what is occurring in the system causes warming which in turn causes new reactions that make it still more warm.  A prime example is the melting arctic sea ice wherein the whitish snow/ice that reflects heat back out to space is replaced by much darker liquid water which absorbs sunlight and thus increases water temperature.  Another would be the removal of arguably our best friends, the trees/forests.  They of course absorb carbon dioxide from the atmosphere for photosynthesis upon which we all depend and their removal means even higher carbon dioxide levels in the atmosphere not only from the trees no longer alive but from arid arid ground that replaces it and allows hotter surface conditions.

            Many climate scientists state that the continued high fossil fuel emissions coupled with these and many other “positive” feedback loops can mean the development of uninhabitable conditions in many regions for humans and other life forms and urge that for the consideration of children today and their children, adult humans have little choice now but to move away from complacency and from slow incremental change to emergency transformative actions and behavior changes on a massive scale.............

​​

​​

“The Climate crisis is all so overwhelming….What can I really do?!”

  • Re-define self-respect with a new reference point.  If you are a parent and have or want children or a person of any age who likes children, one must begin to ask how can I each day, each week help to lessen the burden and indeed dangers children must face that resulted from my habits, my values and that of my generation and ones before?  Without making this question front and center in your ethics, your moral compass, it will remain always very easy to continue as part of the problem.

  • Respect and fight for the non-offenders. Give serious recognition that the many other life forms that are in such low population numbers are heading toward extinction due to known biosphere-damaging activities by us humans.  While the earth and many life forms – mostly microbial -- will continue on without humans some day, this “sixth extinction” event that we now perpetuate is an assault on animals, plants, fungi, and protists who were embedded in Nature’s ecological rules, who, if I may be anthropocentric language-wise briefly, were  in effect "obeying" those biosphere rules.  Even if you are disgusted with human behavior and hubris and have given up unfortunately on humans, polar bears, pollinators, trees, wolves, songbirds, wildflowers, elephants, and so many others should not be the victims of our folly.  Those entities – in this case we Homo sapiens in the “developed” world - who are the primary cause should be the ones responsible to rectify or diligently become dedicated to minimizing the damage.

  • Realize the importance of reciprocity, as Robin Wall Kimmerer in her extraordinary book, Braiding Sweetgrass, implies.  Nearly everything that we in modern, “developed” societies do from almost day one of our birth is spent taking from the earth or again more specifically the biosphere, but seldom if ever reciprocating.  So much so, that now we are faced with the only viable solution being to do far more reciprocating – giving back to the biosphere – than taking.  Look around from wherever you are…everything around you and the energy systems that humans used to construct or grow or kill it came from the earth.  But, through our human-centered rather than nature/earth-centered ethics, we actually began thinking that having lots of material stuff and luxuries was central to happy living on the planet and indeed carried it further with the myth of striving for the “American Dream” which was more of a misleading nightmare than a dream.  Many indigenous peoples for hundreds and even thousands of years have understood the concept of reciprocity, meaning not taking more than what you need,  not disturbing the ecosystems that sustain us and others, and indeed being more like the frog by not drinking up the water upon which it depends.  The consequences of ignoring and indeed often attacking indigenous thinking and ways are now in front of us, and cannot be rescued by technology-emphasis but rather new ethical realization that we must be giving back to our center, the biosphere, the earth.

  • It's what you do.  Politely ignore those who say that it will make no difference whatever you may do…it’s too late, it’s too difficult, it’s fruitless, etc.  If you hear of 500 starving families in a war torn region, victims of nothing more than trying to live and survive there, but it appears that you can be a part of saving half of them but not all, your answer would be of course to do the best we can and reduce the danger, the hardship.  Frankly, much of the human-built world is that way on a smaller less dramatic scale each day.  We drive usually such as to minimize danger and tragedy.  We hold a child’s hand at the curb.  We strive to elect new people who will bring more sanity and competence to their special leadership positions.  And so, on the largest of scales, the climate crisis, indeed the war on Nature soldiered by humans, we must also see now that building the healthiest possible biosphere must be the long overdue magnet of our moral compass.  One last point:  Most of us would prefer not to think that it does not matter how we speak about various races or ethnic groups….we would not think it is simply okay to use let a lone believe in slurs and ugly insults.  This would be contrary to the desire that most of us have of not only a healthy and more peaceful today but an enriching world for future generations.  Fighting for civil rights or against apartheid or for women’s rights, or the right  of our best friends – trees usually means no victory unless we as individuals consistently be living that change.

​​

So, in the light of all of the above, these and dozens more unlisted here are worth integrating into each of our personal new earth-centered, reciprocity-based ethic:

  • Join the 2% club.  That is, there are approximately 720 hours in a month. Give a minimum 2% back to the biosphere and perhaps increase that commitment over time.  This 2% may seem like a small commitment, but one can accomplish a lot in 14+ hrs,/mo including getting veggies from local farms, especially those practicing sustainable agriculture; co-organize neighborhood or community gardens including in urban areas and plant important plants that enhance butterflies such as milkweed and bees supported by many wildlfowers including native plants now limited in numbers, such as the cardinal flower and trout lilly;  participate actively in public demonstration or action on behalf of the a healthier biosphere, recycle-re-use-and don't buy practices, and eliminate the plastic cups drink and straw-use mania.

  • Develop ways to strongly reduce your fossil fuel use to half, including reducing or eliminating retirement account fossil fuel investing.  Urge local school councils and zoning boards to do the same and of course advocate vigorously for finally prioritizing the implementation of not only solar and wind, but something still not seriously initiated -- conservation of energy. Put a plan in place that reduces carbon use through significantly less driving and definitely keeping away from SUVs which even if it is a model for which gas usage is not extreme, it  is still a major carbon emitter because its size and weight requires more energy usage to construct and test as well as the space ti takes on roads which contributes to traffic jams that of course emit considerable additional gases.  Other big carbon emitters or Nature-exploiters, if you will, are air conditioners and high heat clothes dryers.  Eliminate or greatly minimize use. Go to on-line carbon footprint calculator sites and work out a serious plan knowing too that a carbon footprint cannot be fully known – it will always be far more, for of course such calculations cannot accurately account for the energy used to bring water to the crops that you later ate, or the energy to transfer each living chicken to market, and so on…but carbon-reduction priority is as important as maintaining good personal health.  And carbon calculations help to realize a more biosphere-friendly, more reciprocating lifestyle. 

  • When planning travel by airplane, buy carbon offsets or minimally figure out the amount of fossil fuels that flight(s) will be using and contribute an appropriate amount to stop deforestation and/or increase tree planting.  

  • Seek jobs and living situations that reduce or eliminate car commutes and that can even allow bicycling for part or all of the year.

  • Enter into time spent wherein nature can be seen as a mentor.  Forest or park walks where you really look at the non-human life, especially trees, birds, insects.  Invest in a $2 hand lens to take with you including even in urban areas where there is often more nature nearby than we realize.

  • A tough one for many but reduce the iphone/smart phone addiction.  It has now reached the point where at any given minute millions of people around the world are walking about eyes gazed on this collection of an assembled techno device and literally unaware of stunning city gingko and elegant honey locust trees, evocative cumulous clouds, the moon, and much more.  The point being it helps a great deal if we in our striving to be more earth- rather thn human-centered that, well, we actually be less human-centered.  After all, we are the only species that seems to need to think we need all these devices/stuff.

  • Our tencdency is to think that change flows somehow, if it does at all, from the top, from those in power, but history shows that it is not a cliché to realize that most often transformative changes need a an almost war-time committed, consistent and dedicated flow from the bottom up…from every day people and especially those often marginalized or belittled.  Controlled, focused and evidenced-based advocacy is essential and needs to be expressed strongly but responsibly to elect on all levels government representatives who know that a continuous growth economy is an evolving sinkhole, that fostering a non-greedy, sustainable and reciprocating-with-Nature society is our only way upward.  And if they don’t know this fundamental ecological reality today, teach them -- or run for office yourself!

  • Support and propose at school committee meetings and directly with teachers essential school curriculum changes.  Middle and High school students and their teachers (as well as university and community adult education students/citizens) need to be consistently exposed to inspiring examples of peoples around the world, many of them indigenous and peoples of color, who are putting in the time and their happiness to promoting a more eco-sustainable world.  If young people can identify and feel connected, the enthusiasm and interest magnifies. These are the days of massive money solicitation as we all know, but the GEEI  EarthCare program seeks to continue to promote this necessary youth outreach impressive.  Based at you UMass/Boston School for the Environment, even a few dollars goes a long way:  https://dpzook.wixsite.com/earthcaregiving.

34088222983_856ec3905c_z.jpg

Frequent log stacks in parts of the Polish sector of Bialowieza primeval forest.  Cutting stopped by European Union courts but compliance remains tenuous. Photo courtesy of Greenpeace.

ClientEarth lawyer Agata Szafraniuk said, “The judgment of the EU Court has been in force for a month. Meanwhile, Minister Henryk Kowalczyk had still not repealed the decisions that allow the  threefold increase of logging in Europe’s oldest forest.”  EU judges said that these acts and the way they were adopted violate EU law. Repealing the first is a step in the right direction, now he must annul the second,” said Szafraniuk.  Kowalczyk has agreed to repeal one of the two illegal logging permits. But he is still playing for time.  On May 17, Kowalczyk appointed an ‘expert team’ to come up with a long-term plan for the BiaÅ‚owieża Forest.” 

       Poland’s treatment of Europe’s oldest primeval forest, as well as its continued emphasis on coal as it primary energy will be in the global spotlight again later this year, when ironically Poland hosts the annual United Nations climate summit scheduled to be held in Katowice, Poland.

     As you may be aware from the feature story in the Fall-Winter "Calling Home” e-zine issue http://dpzook.wixsite.com/geei-chfall2017 , one of the world’s last remaining vast primeval temperate forests — Bialowieza —  had been under seige by the Polish government and its scientifically unwarranted logging of thousands of trees.

      But in April of this year, 2018,  European Union Court of Justice issued a final and binding ruling that the massive logging was illegal and completely unjustified.  Ten of thousands of trees, many over 100 years were cut down along with of course the habitats and eco-regions to which they were a part. It is crucial that we all realize that the halting of this Poland Law and Order Party Government logging action would not have occurred without many thousands of people actively involved in writing letters, signing petitions, and especially in on-site, distant and consistent protests and non-violent resistance.    While this is good news and the massive logging has stopped, the Environmental News Service (ENS) reports on the reluctance of the ultra-right wing Law and Order party Polish government to fully comply:  “Minister for the Environment Henryk Kowalczyk has only partially complied with the court’s ruling. Four weeks after the judgment, the Polish government finally confirmed it will half-comply with EU court order to reverse its illegal decision to allow massive logging in Bialowieza Forest.

Updates of features in the Fall 2017 Calling Home

eJx9jcsKwjAURP_lri-lFKqSrWjBhRRxV4JETZOr

The Fall, 2017 issue also included a story on John Feldman’s remarkable film. Symbiotic Earth, focused on the ideas and life of world renowned biologist and thinker, the late Lynn Margulis.  In recent months, it has been shown to great audience reviews at various locales in the world, several of which are noted here by Director John Feldman:

 

        Kaikohe, Northland, New Zealand organized by May and Glynne Adams – who were Indiegogo supporters of the film.  It was mostly an audience of professionals (doctors, lawyers, teachers, a psychologist, and others.) who did not know about Lynn before seeing the film. According to May, “They were absolutely BOWLED OVER by it!! “ Glynne wrote:“What an amazing woman she was.... a masterfully engrossing movie.

        Cleveland, Ohio, screened by the North American Montessori Teachers Association (NAMTA) as part of their annual Conference at the Cleveland Museum of Natural History.  David Kahn, exec. Director of NAMTA commented, “The film was a high point for the conference.  The portrayal of interdependence was so dramatic, funny, and symbiosis was so well illustrated. The collaboration of the scientists who became Lynn Margulis’ friends was so biographically compelling, seamless, and keenly personal. Everyone loved it.”

         Berlin, Germany.  The introduction and film chapter six, "Bacteria run the planet" were shown at the Haus der Kulturn der Welt, Germany's national center for the presentation and discussion of international contemporary arts. As shared by organizer Mathias Broeckers, “Our presentation worked very very well, we showed the essay in the beginning, then talked about 90 minutes with some Q&A following and a lot of applause at the end. Peter Berz who did the afterword for the German edition of Margulis’ book Symbiotic Planet was interviewed after the show, and we got a nice little feature on Berlins “Radio 1” station two days after.”

        Melbourne, Australia. The film had its Australian Premiere at the Melbourne School of Design, University of Melbourne. Organizer Daryl Taylor reported: “The night was wonderful. 301 people attended. The response was universal – awe at Lynn and excitement at her work and implications. Many in the audience are interested in hosting home-, neighbourhood- or community-based screenings and adult action learning circles. Others have asked if the film can be shown at a conference (Australian feminist historians and philosophers of science) and used as a resource in high school science teaching. The most common question I fielded when the event was over was ‘how do I get a copy of the film?’ Our questions, answer sand discussion session was fascinating with many ideas contributed from our respondents and our audience." 

        Karlsruhe, Germany,  Symbiotic Earth was screened as part of a research seminar, led by the renowned French philosopher of science, Dr. Bruno Latour. The seminar was dedicated to a multidisciplinary discussion of James Lovelock and Lynn Margulis’ Gaia Hypothesis. After the screening Dr. Latour and one of the seminar participants, Olga Lukyanova commented to me (John) via e-mail: “Let me thank you once again for the screening and even more for the great film! We all were very moved and inspired by Lynn Margulis and her research and that of her colleagues…”

        Hudson, New York. Hudson Area Public Library sponsored by Gwen Gould and Ed Grossman. Library Program Director Brenda Shufelt introduced the film, and the screening was followed by a wine and cheese reception which allowed us to discuss the film informally with the audience. Director Shufelt commented, “Thank you, John! I think it was a wonderful film and gave me so much to think about. I thought you did a lot to make very deep concepts and sometimes even dense scientific information accessible to the layperson. And, visually wonderful and (of course!) the background music…!”

         Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.  Villanova University as organized by Lucy Laffitte who reported that it was “very well received.”

         Barcelona, Spain. at the auditorium of the Institute of Marine Sciences (ICM-CSIC) in Barcelona. The screening was a remarkable success and was attended by over fifty researchers at the Institute.  Prof. Ricard Guerrero, Lynn Margulis’ colleague and friend, introduced the film and engaged in a lively exchange with the audience. Prof. Guerrero is a microbial ecologist and Professor Emeritus at the University of Barcelona. 

Lynn Margulis receives the National Medal of  Science from President Clinton in 1999.  The prestigious award under the leadership of the National Science Foundation recognizes the discoveries and lifetime achievements of the nation's top scientists. Lynn was cited for "outstanding contributions to the understanding of the structure and evolution of living cells, and for extraordinary abilities as a teacher and communicator of science to the public." 

Symbiotic-Earth-Postcard-4X6-1.jpg

Symbiotic Earth can be purchased or rented from Bullfrog Films at http://www.bullfrogfilms.com/catalog/sym.html

The recent September screening of Symbiotic Earth at Harvard University

as organized by Biodiversity for a Livable Climate 

went very well with over 125 attendees and a fine panel discussion.

​

The Biodiversity for a Livable Climate has organzied an important and dynamic conference

"Climate, Biodiversity amd Survival -- Listening to the Voices of Nature"

upcoming on November 17 and 18th

Global Ecologist, Symbiologist and Science Educator Douglas Zook of UMass/Boston

School for the Environment will be among the featured speakers.

See the full program at https://bio4climate.org/species-intelligence-program/

​

***********

And, if you have not seen/read them, check out previous Calling Home e-zine issues. Bookmark for sure this current Summer-Fall 2018 issue and perhaps these two as well 

for reference and sharing!  

http://dpzook.wixsite.com/geeicallinghome

http://dpzook.wixsite.com/geei-chfall2017

​

To contact GEEI: douglas.zook@umb.edu

big_yellow.jpg
bottom of page