top of page

Inspired by Alexander von Humboldt, 1769 - 1859

Voices of the Global Ecology Education Initiative (GEEI)

        A program within UMass/Boston School for the Environment

Summer-Fall, 2018

​

"W-earth the slow scroll, the read, the sharing..."

​

*******

“What I stand for is what I stand on…”  Wendell Berry, writer/farmer/poet

The education imperative: 

Teaching and practicing earth-centered ethics

by Douglas Zook

      In interactions with teenagers and young people generally through the Global Ecology Education Initiative(GEEI) EarthCare program, it became clear to me what is so pro-foundly absent in both pre-college and college curriculums. Invisible to our often walled-in American cultures and narrow knowledge year after year are hundreds, indeed thousands of examples of peoples in nations around the globe who through their thinking and actions are prioritizing their Home, earth.   

      Many are indigenous leaders, as well as other peoples of color and quite often women in the lead.  While they may not use or recognize the terms “ethics” and “biosphere,” they are for the most part practicing an earth-centered ethic, that is they know that without a healthy environment (biosphere), there is at best a tenuous today and a tragic tomorrow.  They know that the human species and many essential life forms (bees/whales/butterflies) and ecosystems  (rainforests/estuaries/lakes) are symbiotically intertwined as a kind of intimate ecology that remains disrespected within our ways of thinking and believing, i.e. our ethics.

     Ethics and its companion “ethos"  has historically and to this moment been a human superiority-centered modus operandi.  We still substantially function and believe within the echoes of well-known western hemisphere philosophers/thinkers of the 17th and 18th centuries:

     “The world is made for man…”  Francis Bacon

     “We (humans) are the lords and possessors of nature…”  René Descartes

     "All things are made for the sake of Man.”  C. Linnaeus

     “Man has rendered the earth more proper” 

             Montesquieu

geei board presentation 8.jpg

These are among the many leaders in countries around the world promoting and practicing an earth-centered ethic.  Many are recipients of the Goldman Environmental Prize.  Such leaders and grassroots efforts need to be a part of high school, university, and community education curricula.                                   

     We now know with substantial microbial fossil evidence in western Australia that life originated here on earth at least 3.6 billion years ago and that the major and even complex advanced systems for life were well established more than 2 billion years ago, including photosynthesis, upon which every human and nearly all species depend on each day.  Indeed, most of the “inventions” which are the staple of our life -- motility, respiration, gene transfers, metabolism, sex -- were not only established in that distant time but central to a successful flourishing earth long before even the first mammal, insect, flower or bird.  If we make the span of life on earth equivalent to a ten mile ribbon, modern Homo sapiens' arrival, such as from the start of the Industrial Age (circa 1840) would be a mere thread at the ribbon edge.  Despite being the ultimate latecomer, so many humans today continue to ignore Nature and its profound experience and “wisdom.”  Yet, there are many peoples who understand the importance of humility and who know that we must be working not to control, conquer, or even manage “the environment”, but seek out and practice how best to fit in with the biosphere’s rules and systems.

      A powerful way to engage any potential learner including and perhaps most importantly young people, is not only to share relevancy of the subject matter --  in this case of developing essential earth-centered ethics -- with them but to inspire by visually and interactively showcasing actual practitioners. Young people through education in and out of school need to see specific peoples in many different cultures/nations worldwide living and working to build a healthy community that is compatible with a having a future, that is something sustainable. This educational focus is essential for the future wheel to keep turning.  Our continued ignorance of this need in public and private schooling at all levels is one of the most serious threats to a viable future for youth.

     It is time to priority-push for student curriculum and courses to include Nobel Prize recipient the late Wangari Maathai and Green Belt Movement of Kenya; Bunker Roy and the Barefoot College of the Himalayas;  Ruth Buendia and the Asháninka peoples of Peru; Nohra Padilla of Colombia; Aleta Baun and the Mollo peoples of Timor Indonesia; Humberto Rios Labrada, Cuba;  Marc Ona, Gabon; the late Berta Cacéras, Honduras; Jaime Lerner, Brazil; Berito Kuwari and the U’Wa peoples of Colombia; and/or many, many others. 

     Our admittedly “little” speck", Global Ecology Education Initiative EarthCare program, seeks to continue do its part in promoting this educational imperative, not only by the periodic school visits locally but with a planned interactive, curriculum-friendly web site accessible  for teachers and their students anywhere.  

     This kind of essential earth-centered and eco-sustainable curriculum advocacy has the added correlating benefit of helping young people and future generations to be more geography- and culture-literate as well as respectful.  There is no controversy over the fact that American students (and often their parents) at various levels are among the most illiterate in the world when it comes to knowing where  other countries are located, why they are important, what kinds of cultural practices and ideas are there and so on.  Thus, the whole theme of the EarthCare earth-centered message serves as a positive educational counterpoint to the various government, corporate and even citizen attacks on the environment and climate science, the demeaning of other nations and peoples, the ignorance about indigenous peoples and their history,  the belittling of biodiversity, and the illegitimacy of touting the United States above the nations of the world.  Global Ecology and earth-centered ethics education is tantamount to a healthy educational revolution for this land, and it can start by not only entering into conversation but even more impactful as part of  middle/high school, university and adult education curricula.

Consider supporting the effort today by following the easy steps at this EarthCare giver web site:  

https://dpzook.wixsite.com/earthcaregiving

The growing bicycling culture – transporting us to a safer daily use and to a healthier, more sustainable future

by Laura Borrelli and Thomas McNulty

​

      I (Laura) was never interested in “politics.” I accepted early on that politics was a category of things-- people, policies, laws, bills, procedures -- that just went over my head. I assumed there was an underdeveloped part of my brain, making it impossible for me to comprehend, keep up with, or even care about anything regarding what people were calling “political conversations.” It wasn't until my mid-20s, while dating a self-described “politically-charged” person, that we got in a heated conversation about a social issue and he said to me, "You realize, Laura, that you're talking about politics right now? This is what politics is."

      Fast forward almost 10 years. It was September 1, I was getting ready for the new school year at the local high school where I teach Advanced Placement Biology. Running errands, I was riding my bicycle on Beacon Street in Somerville, MA, when suddenly my path was blocked by a car door. I hit the door, flipped over the handlebars, and landed on my shoulder and hands. I ended up with some scrapes and bruises and ruined a dress I was wearing for the first time. The driver gave me a ride to the bike shop, where he paid for my repairs.

      I was lucky. Extremely lucky. My story is trivial, while many others are deadly. In June of that school year, less than a half-mile from my crash, 27-year-old Amanda Phillips swerved to avoid getting "doored" and instead was hit by a truck passing her too closely. That bicycle ride ended up being her last, as she died a short time later. A neighbor of mine heard Amanda’s bloodcurdling scream as she met her unexpected death, and that neighbor was so struck by the sound of that scream, and shaken at the thought of her own children riding bikes on those same streets one day, that she got herself involved in bike advocacy right then and there and helped organize the Ghost Bike Memorial Ceremony for Amanda. Ghost bikes, which can be found around the world, are roadside memorials involving stripped-down bikes painted white, erected in memory of cyclists killed while cycling. They are usually located at the location of the cyclists’ crash.

      By the time of Amanda Phillips' death, I had already immersed myself into the bicycle advocacy community, driven by my own, less serious, dooring incident. I found myself welcomed with open arms into a multi-layered community of brilliant, passionate cyclists who prioritize safety on the streets. The bike advocacy community of Boston, Cambridge, and Somerville includes groups ranging from a few members, such as the Ghost Bike Planning Committee, to a few thousand, like MassBike Coalition. Some groups, like the Somerville Bike Committee and the Cambridge Bike Safety Group, focus on influencing city decisions such as making road infrastructure changes, while other groups, like the Boston Bike Party Community, organize massive costumed bike rides around town. At the start of that school year, fueled by my crash, I started up a bike advocacy student group, the Cambridge Rindge and Latin School  Student Bike Advocates, and managed to gather a small group of students interested in promoting bicycle safety throughout the school where, we discovered, over 300 students rode their bikes to school throughout the year.

      While I (Thomas) have been lucky enough not to have been in a serious crash, there have been multiple times in my life where I have been incredibly close to experiencing what a lot of City bikers classify as right of passage experiences. Things like being doored, having cars drive far too close to me, having to brake at an intersection when I have the right of way, and more, are things that bikers accept as normal, when in reality they are far from it. There's a blatant lack of respect for bikers by some motorists likely because of an entitlement that they feel for owning a car, and having places to be which, in their minds, supersede others. 

     There are a wide range of organizations advocating for safer streets not only in the Boston/Cambridge/Somerville area but in various cities in the nation. Many bike advocates share similar human-centric practical reasons for their ethical decision-making to ride a bike and promote safe bicycling in their communities. But when it comes to Earth-centered ethical decision-making, there's a powerful argument for prioritizing biking as well!

     How does cycling affect the world in the long run? By converting a small number of people who drive cars to cycling we prevent the emissions of  tonnes of carbon dioxide/yr. Such a conversion means theoretically that millions of gallons of fossil fuel are kept out of the amosphere depending on how many people convert to cycling. Cars and trucks account for much of the USA emissions.  Clearly, by cutting down on the amount of people driving and the number of hours people drive, we can greatly reduce the damage we are doing to the biosphere. It’s projected  that, worldwide, motorists will account for â…“ of carbon emissions by 2050. 

 

laura1.jpg

Laura Borrelli is a biology teacher at Cambridge Rindge and Latin high school, Cambridge, MA where she also advises the student bike advocates group. She lives in Somerville, where she participates in various other bike advocacy groups and causes and plays drums in an activist marching band, “Second Line Social Aid and Pleasure Society Brass Band”

thomas1.jpg

Thomas McNulty is a senior at Cambridge Rindge and Latin high school and former AP  Biology student of Ms. Borrelli. He plans to enter Boston College for biology studies in the Fall.      

Edward Lamson Henry - The New Woman.jpg

"The New Woman," a painting by Edward Lamson Henry, 1892

      Additionally, the amount of privately-owned cars is estimated to triple in that same time frame. The actual carbon cost of bikes is relatively insignificant when compared to cars.  The average energy to construct a bicycle uses about 530 lbs of greenhouse gases compared to the 6,000+ lbs used in the construction of some cars. This is not to mention the cost of energy-intensive maintainance of roads that are subject to the heavier weight of cars compared to bikes.

      Many people  who drive electric and hybrid cars overlook the carbon cost of what makes them unique - its  batteries. The construction of its lithium ion batteries and materials can be very harmful for the environment. To actually harvest those materials used in the lithium ion batteries and other parts of the car requires intensive mining offshore, producing even more carbon dioxide emissions.  And, while we like to think of electric cars as eco-friendly, depending on how your community produces electricity, electric cars can in some cases be nearly equivalent to the regular car.

      Nevertheless, it is actually quite difficult to accurately quantify how much a cycling lifestyle saves in carbon emissions. It’s not as simple as approximating that each mile or km ridden by a bike saves the pound of carbon that could otherwise be emitted by a car. In-depth studies attempt to  take into account variables such as the infrastructure that supports cars (car washes,  tire stores, etc.), the attraction of road users based on the road infrastructure a city provides (many car lanes, wide bike lanes, etc.), whether or not cyclists respire more, eat more, make different food choices, and/or live longer, to name just a few.

      But according to Lewis Fulton, transportation researcher at University of California, Davis, and the Director of STEPS (Sustainable Transportation Energy Pathways) and a speaker at the most recent Climate Change Summit in Paris, cycling can play a big role -- perhaps one of the greatest impacts -- in combating global warming. He estimates that an 11% reduction in carbon emissions from “urban passenger transport” could come about by 2050 if only the number of daily urban bicycle travelers in the US and Canada was increased to 20-30%.

      For years  countries in the European Union have been experimenting with increased biking. Culturally, biking is seen more favorably in many countries there.  Indeed, the impact of the change as to the preferred mode of transportation has been quite astounding. Citizens in the EU in year 2000, for example,  biked an estimated  whopping 71 billion kilometers, cutting their greenhouse gas (GHG) output by an estimated 3-6%.  This is not to mention the GHG’s saved in not having to repair the roads as frequently,  as well as saved in the production of what would have been cars, but instead were bikes.

      So why can’t we replicate this in the United States and turn Lewis Fulton’s estimation into a reality? Well, according to city planner Jeff Speck, author of the acclaimed book, Walkable City (2012), the reason has to do with “today’s landscape of disassociated professions and special interests that determine the shape of our communities.” He goes on to explain that if cities were designed by generalists, there would be more acknowledgement of certain facts, including my favorite: “More lanes usually just lead to more traffic.” This can be applied to both car lanes leading to more car traffic, and more bike lanes leading to more bike traffic. Unfortunately, the former is what is seen more often.

      Bicycle use, and especially prioritizing them in city planning  can combat human-influenced climate change.  Whether realized by each rider or not, regular bicycle  users are making impacts beyond local transportation for commuting and recreational purposes. Rather they are promoting key sustainable practices, that is,  helping to build a more compatible future with and for the biosphere.  And, spreading the word on the value of bicycles is growing.  One Jamaica Plain/Boston-based organization, Bikes Not Bombs, has shipped 70,000 bicycles to 14 countries in Central America and Africa, some destined for repurposing as grain mills, coffee-bean deshellers, and corn dekernelers. The bicycle, invented in Germany in the early 1800’s, is one of the most efficient human-powered machines ever made, so it’s not unreasonable to think it can be used for many purposes - purposes that can literally mean a much less threatening future for all of us.

Resources 

     _wheels_vs_four.html

********

Personal remembrances of yesterday’s courage and commitment -- needed today more than ever

by Douglas Zook

bottom of page